All Pakistan Newspapers Society.
All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) is the organization of the major Pakistani newspapers owners. Its election is held every year and three major groups of newspapers are the major players, and they are: Jang Group, Dawn Group and Nawa-i-Waqt Group. These groups are accused for bribing the smaller newspapers and get benefit at large from the successive governments. This is the major body which refuses to give the Wage Board Award to the working journalists. According to the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, the labor laws are violated in the Pakistani newspaper industry but no government dares to take action against this powerful elite of the country.
What is the All Pakistan Newspaper Society?
The All Pakistan Newspapers Society is an organisation of all the publishers of Pakistan. It was founded in 1953 by the major, pioneering editors and publishers of they day to facilitate the exchange of views between the editors of the major publications of Pakistan and to protect the rights of newspapers by giving them a voice to appeal unfair decisions against them.
Today, the APNS is a clearing house of sorts for its member publications, safeguarding the commercial interests of newspapers under its membership (including tax payment). For example, if a company advertises in a publication but refuses to pay, the publication complains to the APNS. The APNS gives the agency an ultimatum: pay or get blacklisted.
This is an effective threat. Advertisers and the media have a symbiotic relationship – both need the other to survive. A newspaper’s main income comes from its advertisers (whether government owned or private), and the mass media and its wide range of audiences is the main reason advertisements are so effective. It is therefore very damaging for an advertising agency or a company to be blacklisted by the APNS, which has 243 member publications to date. These publications include weeklies, monthlies, sports magazines, women’s magazines, computer magazines, English and Urdu publications – with the exception of trade journals or newsletters, which are run within the company they originate from. (It is also very unlikely that they will run into trouble with the government considering their content is on leather or the quality of cotton threads or so on).
Neither journalists nor editors, though, have much to do with the dealings of the APNS. This may seem a bit misleading, with the ‘newspapers’ part of the title. The APNS, however, has nothing to do with the editorial content of any newspaper or publication. The APNS exists solely to give newspapers a voice if they are treated unfairly, or, as explained above, to protect their commercial interest. (Editors and journalists have their own organisations – the Council of Pakistan Editors (CPNE) and the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) respectively).
Today, there are 71 accredited advertising agencies and 243 publications under the APNS umbrella. The full list of these can be obtained from the latest APNS directory or APNS Awards Journal.When Pakistan first appeared on the map, the Muslims of India got what they wished for after years of struggle. Unfortunately, along with this new piece of land they also inherited many problems. From unstoppable refugees to depleted army supplies to a sore lack of money, Pakistan had immense trouble getting into gear. Not surprisingly, these many problems included problems with the press – or more specifically, problems with freedom of the press. It is often said that the ‘blackest of black press laws’ came about in 1960, (and its amendment in 1963) in the form of Ayub Khan’s Press and Publications Ordinance (PPO). It was called such because it gave the government total, absolute control, and journalists were reduced to mere stenographers.
However, it would be a mistake to assume that nobody attempted to interfere with the press before that. To put into perspective how dismal the situation was, Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s opening speech was nearly censored by bureaucrats who were unhappy with the reference to the masses being able to worship wherever they pleased, be it mosques or temples. This set the tone for what was to follow for the press. Obviously, the print media had the largest reach at the time. Consequently, it suffered the most.
Who were the founding fathers of the APNS?
Founders: Hamid Nizami, Altaf Hussain – all the important, pioneering editors of the day. In 1950, the Pakistan Newspapers Society (PNS) was founded (to emerge the existing publishers), when the editors of the time realised that the print media a) needed organisation and b) needed a clearing house. However, the PNS didn’t last for very long as it didn’t receive much support from publishers, advertisers or authorities.
Three years later in 1953 the All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) came into being. It was badly needed to ‘facilitate the exchange of views amongst newspaper owners on matters of common interest. APNS successfully gave newspaper owners the means to watch over, protect, preserve and promote the rights and interest of the newspaper industry on matters directly or indirectly affecting its rights and interests.’ The Daily DAWN was the founding member. It was decided that the headquarters would be in Karachi, where they are to this day.
A couple of years later in 1955, the Council of Pakistan Editors (CPNE) was established as a representative body of the editors of the publications of Pakistan. Both the CPNE and the APNS struggled against black press laws that trampled over the freedom of the press. They have been successful in varying degrees. For example, they had been repealing the Press and Publications Ordinance passed by Ayub Khan in 1960 (and later amended in 1963). The ordinance gave total control to the government – even reports on the National Assembly proceedings were monitored). Journalists were reduced to stenographers. After a long, drawn out struggle, the law was taken back in 1988 when Benazir Bhutto came to power. Whether this was because of the valiant struggles of the APNS and CPNE or because the authorities concerned did not want Bhutto to have power is too close to call. Nevertheless, to put in perspective how it has expanded over the years, in 1971 it headed 41 publications with only the major publications involved. Today, there are 262, covering the two major newsgroups, Dawn and Jang, and many smaller publications covering most of the accessible region in Pakistan. (This might have more to do with there being more publications in Pakistan now than the APNS’s prowess at recruiting publications. It is much easier to start a newspaper or publication now than it was before – rather than going through the rigmarole of seeking permission from the government or concerned authorities, anyone can inform the government that they would like to begin their own publication. If they get a response within four months, it is assumed that permission has been granted).
Role and actions of the APNS
The focus today seems to be more on commercial than freedom. Many advertising agencies have been blacklisted, usually because they did not pay on time or at all. The APNS, therefore has two functions: first, to safeguard the commercial interests of newspapers and second, to protect the rights of newspapers and publications. Enter freedom of speech. Given Pakistan’s troubled history, though, it has had its work cut out for it in this regard. When it comes to the freedom of the press, the APNS and the CPNE have struggled together. (It is in both their interests, obviously).
There are many instances where the press has been hounded by the government, notably in the 50s and 60s, and even more recently than that. The APNS maintains that it has always assisted the press and fought for its freedom rights. To illustrate how, here is some background information.
In late 1998, the Jang Group office was raided by a government investigative agency under the cover of 'routine examination' for ‘tax purposes’. Along with this routine examination, it was ‘suggested’ that 16 investigative reporters be laid off (from Jang and The News). This was because incriminating stories about the Prime Minister’s family not paying debts were being run. According to the Jang group, the ‘routine examination’ was nothing more than a ploy to stop their newspapers printing these incriminating (albeit true) stories about important officials. Despite being asked explicitly not to publish any more, the Jang group went ahead anyway. The investigative officials were sent away.
Soon after this, the government cut off all its advertising to all Jang group newspapers. The publications had not technically broken any laws, so nobody could be arrested. Cutting off advertising, however, was just as bad, if not worse. Just as companies lose a lot of money if they are blacklisted by an organisation with 242 publications under it, it is very damaging to newspapers to have their main source of advertising taken away as this is how they make most of their money. For the icing on the cake, tax evasion notices were issued to the Jang group and its owners, Mir Shakilur Rehman and Mir Javed ur Rehman amounting to nearly Rs 2 billion. Several FIRs were lodged against him, and he was in danger of being arrested on a wrongful tax evasion charge. To contest all these charges the Jang group held a press conference the following month. Here, the government claimed that it should have a say in which journalist worked for which newspaper. The Jang group’s plan backfired, as the press conference also resulted in the government freezing its bank account and confiscating newsprint – at the end of the day, the group had enough newsprint to be able to print for only three days a week. Salaries could no longer be paid, and newspapers would obviously have trouble getting printed without newsprint. It seemed unlikely that the Jang group could continue publishing for very long.
The APNS then formed a committee from which it could appeal to the government and the Supreme Court. The committee informed the government that it had little right to remove journalists from their jobs. The APNS representatives stated to both the federal information minister and separately to the Ehtesab Bureau chief, that they would not remove journalists from their jobs as a result of government pressure. This was confirmed the same night in a BBC interview and subsequently in correspondence with the Ehtesab Bureau. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, where the government was asked to release the newsprint back to the newspapers. The government declined. Anyone who contested it was beaten up. The PFUJ, silent for so long, now stood up and protested.
When other newspapers provided the Jang group with newsprint (perhaps out of sympathy?), they were threatened by irate FIA officials that their newspapers too would be forced to shut down. In February, the Supreme Court, at the behest of the APNS, once again ordered the release of the newspint, which the government finally released.The FIA officers were withdrawn from the Jang offices, the bank accounts went back to normal and publication resumed.
The one positive aspect that emerged from all this was that the government’s antics meant everyone’s sympathy was directed towards the Jang group – not just the common public (which for the most part is unaware of the mighty struggles of the press) but of journalists, publishers, national and international media organisations.
The Jang group claims that the APNS provided it with no help. The APNS disagrees, and issued a press release in the past to clear up the matter. Here is what the APNS president had to say: "The APNS has been instrumental in reducing the fetters from the Jang Group in the 21-day period in January. During this time, detained newsprint dealer was released from the custody of the FIA without any preconditions. During the crisis period, the APNS also affected the single largest clearance of newsprint reels.
"The APNS played a pivotal role in the opening of hitherto frozen bank accounts in the nationalised banks especially in Habib Bank Limited, and by the end of the 21-day period had facilitated the re-opening of Letters of Credit which had been earlier stopped by the tax authorities."
According to him, the government deliberately delayed both the unfreezing of the bank accounts and the releasing of newsprint, which was not the APNS's fault. The struggles of the APNS, combined with the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE) finally achieved the Freedom of Information Ordinance in 2002. (Unfortunately, the Defamation Ordinance also snaked its way in, which prevented freedom being practised the way it should).
Awards of the APNS
Journalists and advertisers both are encouraged to achieve the best by standards set by the APNS. Should they surpass these standards, they receive awards at an annual awards ceremony (the last of which was held on 31 March 2006). The Advertising Awards were initiated in 1981, with Journalist Awards following in 1982. Advertising Awards are given on a 1st, 2nd, 3rd basis and include: Business Performance Awards
Client Performance Awards
Product Launch Award
Best Copy Award (English and Urdu)
Best Visual Design (colour and black and white)
Public Service Campaign
The Journalist Awards, however, are awarded differently, with only one person winning each category. The categories include: Best Scoop
Best Column
Best Feature (English, Urdu, Regional)
Best Investigative Report
Best Cartoon
Best Photograph
Best Article (English, Urdu, Regional)
The Wage Board Award is a salary package given to newspapers. The APNS has been consistently denying the Wage Board award to its journalists, and has come under fire for it but consistently refuses to give it, which, according to the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, is against the law, but no one dares to do anything against the county’s elite.
To sum up, then, the APNS is a clearing house and an enforcer of press freedom rules/laws. It is quite successful with the former – the latter is not as easy. The freedom of the media in Pakistan has come a long way, even though it might not have reached where it has without the help of the APNS. But it still has some more to go, even though it has been told (by the present government) it will be fully supported in transforming the press into a free one, bearing in mind that a state can function properly only if the press is free to do its job.
The Associated Press of Pakistan (APP):
The Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) started its life in 1947 with the independence of Pakistan. Initially it was run through a Trust, but owing to financial bottlenecks, it was taken over by the Government through an Ordinance called; "Associated Press of Pakistan (taking over) Ordinance 1961", on 15th June 1961, to put it on a sound financial footing.
The journalists were allowed to retain their independent status under this ordinance. They were not regarded as government or semi-government employees and were governed by Labour Laws, which also encompass Newspaper Industry in Pakistan.
APP was later converted into Corporation on October 19, 2002 through an Ordinance renaming it as Associated Press of Pakistan Corporation (APPC) and lending a status of semi government media government.
It is no longer administered by the labour laws. The rules of APPC are pending notification by the Establishment Division and it is administered through the Managing Director, appointed by the Government.
Notwithstanding its conversion into Corporation, the News Agency continues to enjoy and avail the professional freedom. APPC is country’s premier national news agency which comprises highly qualified and professionally competent editorial staffers.
APP remains committed to excellent journalistic traditions by objective and accurate reporting, observing code of ethics with regard to responsible journalism. A contradiction of an APP story is a rare phenomenon.
The News Agency is mandated to ensure coverage of all important developments and events sans any prejudice on diverse fronts within the country and abroad with objective professional approach.
Beginning its life in small buildings in Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi with the reporters relying on bulky typewriters and noisy tele- printers, the APP over the years has grown into a state-of-the-art and modern news organization.
Computers have replaced typewriters and the Agency's offices are connected through Local, and Wide Area Networks. From a transmission speed of 50 words per minute, it now provides news at a speed of 1200 WPM, most of which is directly fed into the computers of the subscribers simultaneously throughout Pakistan and overseas. Currently APP has its own buildings at Islamabad and Lahore.
The news agency is playing a leading role by supplying authentic and credible news to the print and electronic media round-the-clock. Around one thousand news, over two hundred pictures and clean feed of Video News Service (VNS) containing important events and developments are put on wire daily for onward consumption by the media subscribers.
The number of news reports, released to the National Media daily in English, Urdu, Sindhi and Pushto languages have recorded significant improvement with complete domination over all other news agencies in the country.
Print and pictorial news service of APP unabatedly wrest prominent space in the national and regional English, Urdu, Sindhi and Pushto papers. APP’s Special Correspondents, posted at key destinations abroad including Washington, New York, London, Beijing and New Delhi are making effective contribution towards promoting country’s image and stance on various national and regional issues in their true perspective.
With strong editorial network at the Headquarters, Provincial Bureaus, Stations and District Correspondents, the news agency is rendering important professional contribution to cater to the requirements of print, electronic and pictorial media in various fields.
Five new stations including Sialkot, Abbotabad, Sargodha, D.I.Khan and Bahawalpur have been set up by APP besides expanding the network of the District Correspondents to ensure extensive coverage of political, economic and social activities at the grassroots level.
Enjoying sizeable amount of freedom, APP is comprehensively and extensively covering all important developments and engagements of the ruling coalition as well as opposition political parties with unbiased approach. Objectivity and credibility of the news are the hallmark of the sound professional footing of the news agency.
The Charter of Functions is to:
- Ensure free and efficient flow of news to the people through print and electronic media including radio, television and newspapers as well as business and non-media subscribers for which they pay a regular monthly subscription to APP.
- Supply unbiased and reliable print and pictorial news service speedily and contribute features to national and international print and electronic news agencies, newspapers, radio and television networks with which it has entered into agreements.
- Transmit correct and reliable political, economic, financial and commercial news including national and international rates of commodities to its subscribers; expand and develop news service in the country ensuring high journalistic standards.
RECENT INITIATIVES:
APP Video News Service, which was formally launched in October last year is well-positioned to cater to the needs of news channels. This is a major leap forward, expanding and enhancing the agency's role in the national media by providing clean feed on major developments and important events to the electronic media organizations within the country and abroad.
The agency has transformed its website making it professionally more vibrant as important multi-lingual news reports, photos and VNS footage are promptly placed on it through fast updating mechanism.
The website, which serves as a reservoir of latest news as well as archive of transmitted news, is frequented by thousands of individuals and organizations, particularly Pakistani missions abroad, which is reflective of its professional significance.
Important news are also translated in Arabic language which are not only placed on the website, but also transmitted to the print and electronic media of the Arab World.
Another important feature of the APP professional working is extensive monitoring of major local and foreign news channels and the news based on this exercise capture tangible space in the newspapers on perennial basis.
APP has News Exchange Agreements with 37 Foreign News Agencies under which bouquet of important news is transmitted to them on daily basis with an aim to showcasing Pakistan’s point of view on regional and international affairs.
Sans any suspicion, APP is armed with new professional techniques and skills by making inroads in modern and contemporary regime of Information Technology to satiate the professional appetite of competitive media subscribers.
With experienced professional hands and young blood, APP is well-positioned to make bold forays on professional horizons in view of sea change in the country’s media.
Discarding the temptation of any complacency, professional strategy of APP News Service is revisited as and when required to withstand fast emerging professional challenges in the media sector.
Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority(PEMRA):
The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) is a regulatory body established by Pakistan on 1 March 2002.The Authority is responsible for facilitating and regulating the establishment and operation of all private broadcast media and distribution services in Pakistan established for the purpose of international, national, provincial, district, and local or special target audiences.
PEMRA's Mandate:
· Improve the standards of information, education and entertainment.
· Enlarge the choice available to the people of Pakistan in the media for news, current affairs, religious knowledge, art, culture, science, technology, economic development, social sector concerns, music, sports, drama and other subjects of public and national interest.
· Facilitate the devolution of responsibility and power to the grass roots by improving the access of the people to mass media at the local and community level.
· Ensure accountability, transparency and good governance by optimization the free flow of information.
Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR):
Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) is an administrative organization within the military of Pakistan that coordinates military information with Pakistan's public press. The ISPR is now headed by Major General Athar Abbas who took over from Major General Waheed Arshad on 15 January 2008.
History
The public relations requirements of the Armed Forces are looked after by the ISPR Directorate. The ISPR Directorate was established in 1947. The Directorate is staffed with military and civilian officers. It functions as a part of the Joint Staff Headquarters and its purpose is to garner national support for the Armed Forces and strengthen their resolve to accomplish the assigned mission while undermining the will of the adversary. It also acts as an interface between the Armed Forces, the media and the public. It formulates much of the media policy of Pakistan's military, safeguards the Armed Forces from negative influences and monitors both international and domestic media.
The ISPR also issues notices regarding military exercises and notifies relevant parties and the public media about Pakistan's indigenous ballistic missile testing program. Apart from functioning as the public relations body of the Pakistan Army, the ISPR handles exclusive dissemination of information regarding Pakistan's military operations in Wana & Swat. The news of a clash in Balochistan between military contingents and unknown armed personnel resulting in the death of the tribal leader Nawab Akbar Bugti was also verified once the ISPR issued comments on the news. The news regarding the recent events of the Lal Masjid conflict was also disseminated by the ISPR.
The ISPR has also produced TV drama serials, such as the widely popular Alpha Bravo Charlie, Sunehre Din, 6th September Nishan-e-Haider plays and the recent miniseries Wilco.
Internews Pakistan:
An international non-government organization operational in over 40 countries, Internews supports open media worldwide. Internews Pakistan is training radio journalists and station managers in the standards and practices of professional journalism and assisting journalism curriculum development. It is also lobbying for media law and policy development all aimed at fostering a vigorous and diverse mass media as an essential cornerstone of a progressive society.
Internews Network is implementing a media assistance program in Pakistan, supporting the fledgling non-government radio stations and other media-representative bodies with technical, editorial and management training.
Goals:
Internews recognizes the efforts of the Government of Pakistan in opening up the broadcast media sector in particular and looks to strengthening this endeavor. Internews will engage key non-government media being built and strengthened so they may fulfill their new role as alternative voices in a country that is experiencing an open and plural media in the broadcast sector for the first time in its history. The overall goal of the Internews program is to ensure skilled, independent and financially viable media outlets exist, particularly in the broadcast sector, and are able to provide citizens of Pakistan with quality information and education programs.
Internews assists the Pakistani broadcast media to serve as a principal conduit for dialogue, as the people increasingly seek to communicate with their local, provincial and national leaderships. On its own and in collaboration with selected partners in Pakistan, Internews seeks to strengthen the technical competence of targeted media institutions to ensure their long-term sustainability through its program. The Pakistani broadcast sector, especially the private sector radio stations that have been issued licenses to operate, face the challenge of standardizing skills and strengthening their capacities to function effectively in the improving broadcast media environment.
Challenges:
Key challenges to a successful broadcast media in Pakistan include:
· A lack of technical know-how and equipment maintenance skills.
· Establishing and maintaining economic viability.
· Exercising their rights and responsibilities as decreed in the constitution and law.
· Practicing accurate and balanced analytical reporting.
· Reporting on the parliament to promote good governance.
· Building capacities to report events and processes at the local level.
Activities:
Internews is implementing a number of activities that will meet these urgent needs and is assisting the building of a viable independent media as Pakistan progresses in opening up its broadcast sector. Internews activities that seek to address these challenges in Pakistan include:
· Technical support and hands-on training for journalists and radio stations
· In-house mentoring for radio stations by international experts
· Seminars and support for community radio
· Legal resource assistance to the stakeholders, including the broadcast sector regulator, in improving the broadcast media environment
· Technical and legal assistance to stakeholders in media policy development
Through these undertakings, Internews will be playing an important role in helping improve the regulatory environment and the media broadcast sector in Pakistan. Internews is an international organization that operates in about 40 countries to promote open media worldwide.
PAKISTAN Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ):
PAKISTAN Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) is a trade Union of working journalists of Pakistan. But its 50 years history proves that it is more than a trade union. It is in fact a movement whose annals are replete with memorable battles both in the field of earning an honorable living wages and waging a relentless crusade for the noble cause of freedom of the press and expression.
While discussing the history of the PFUJ one must not be oblivious of the fact that the organization grew up facing great odds. In Pakistan trade unions have never been allowed to function freely. The feudal-capitalist oriented establishment has always treated them with a pinch of salt incredulously often considering them as” communist” and” subversive “. That is why even today while technically speaking we have the right of association and right of strike these are subject to such restrictive provision that in effect they negate their free exercise.
The successive government has introduced marginal reforms and in essence has ensured protection of the system of exploitation. The one glaring example of this is the vicious system of employment on contract basis legitimised and patronised by the officialdom (both civilian and military) in collusion with the capitalist class. This system deprives the workers of all benefits accruing from the labour laws proving the adage giving by one hand and taking back by another.
In the field of purely economic demands the PFUJ’s past history is marked by memorable milestones such as the 49-day long strike in 1949 in the daily “Sindh Observer”, Karachi, led by the Sindh Union of Journalists which later played a leading role in the formation of the PFUJ in 1950, the strike in the” Times of Karachi” 1954, daily “Anjam” Karachi. (1966), daily “Kohistan” Lahore (1969), the hunger strike led by the PPL (Pakistan Times and Imroze) workers union and joined by the PUJ for the reinstatement of the four lower grade employees in January 1977, the historic 10-days countrywide strike for the implementation of the interim award by the Second Wage Board in April 1970, and over 45-days long hunger strike movement in 1974 for the reinstatement of arbitrarily sacked journalists and other employees of the daily “Musawaat” Lahore. This was a countrywide movement resulting in imprisonment of over 300 journalists and press workers.
The 1970 ten-day countrywide strike may be remembered for a number of significant reasons. The main reason of course was the intransigence and refusal by the proprietor’s body (the All Pakistan Newspapers Society) to accept and implement the award announced by the Second Wage Board for 35 per cent interim relief after a decade-long wage freeze. It may be pertinent to note that at that time the Wage Board and its award was legally meant for the journalists alone and did not cover other employees of Newspapers and News Agencies and yet the APNS was not prepared to accept and implement it. This belies and knocks out the genuineness of the APNS’s argument it is advancing at present that it is agreeable to implement the Seventh Wage Board Award to the Journalists but not for the others employees. It was the APNS’s refusal to implement the Second wage Board Award even after losing their petitions in the High Court that the PFUJ had to resort to the weapon of strike.
One may recall how in desperation the fourteen Newspaper editors and proprietors issued a joint statement a few days before the strike began alleging that the strike was inspired by ” Communists and Maulana Bhashani”. They shamelessly asked General Yahya’s Military Government to intervene and take action against the PFUJ and its leaders under Martial Law Regulations.
Another significant aspect of the 1970 strike was that for the first time it provided a joint platform of action for the entire Newspaper workers community-journalists, calligraphists and press workers. As the first and second Wage Board were for journalists alone. PFUJ repeatedly asked the government to either form a separate Wage Board for other workers of the Newspaper industry or include them in the board meant for journalists. The PFUJ’s argument was that a newspaper is produced not only by journalists, but by the collective labour and effort of all the employees of a newspaper establishment who work under the same roof, paid by the same employer, and equally affected by vagaries of socio-economic conditions including the price hike. It was for this reason that the PFUJ’s four-point strike charter included the demand for payment of the interim relief to the non-journalists employees also. It was because of the united struggle of the newspaper industry workers that the strike was successful and the employers were made to pay the interim relief not only to the journalists but to the non-journalists employees as well.
Now the APNS, which earlier boycotted the Seventh Wage Board, is now refusing to implement its award. It is not doing it by invoking the bogy of” Communist” or some” Maulana Bhashani “. It is now raising such hackneyed slogans as” financial freedom “,” laissez faire” and” democratic dispensation “. When they urge for” laissez faire”, they infect want” laissez aller “; that is to say unrestricted freedom to exploit. When it talks of ” democratic dispensation” or ” press control” in respect of the Wage Board, it forgets the newspaper employees ( condition of service) act, 1973 is a legislation passed and adopted unanimously by an elected parliament. It is this act under which the constitution of the Wage Board for newspaper employees is provided. Now both the APNS and CPNE (another name of APNS) are asking a military government to repeal a legislation introduced by a democratically elected parliament. What a concern for democratic dispensation and role of law.
Except for the present U-turn, the APNS has been Willy Nilly accepting the Wage Board arrangement for the last forty years since these were first introduced in 1960. And the Wage board was not the creation of a Government fiat. It was a unanimously adopted resolution of the constituent Assembly of Pakistan which asked the Government to appoint a Press Commission to study the conditions of the national press with particular reference to the working conditions of journalists on the lines of Royal Press Commission of Britain .It was in pursuance of a PFUJ’s demand and the constituent assembly resolution that the government appointed a press commission in 1954, which could not function due to rivalry commission was again reconstituted in 1958 under the chairmanship of Justice Tayyabji of the Sindh High Court. It worked with full co-operation of the working journalists and the proprietors and editors and submitted its report in March 1959. It was this commission that recommended the constitution of a Wage Board for working journalists. First Wage Board was constituted in 1960. The Newspaper Employees (Condition of Service) Act, 1973, provided the setting up of the wage board for all newspaper employees as demanded by the PFUJ. During the last forty years that saw seven wage boards and their awards, the newspaper proprietors have prospered enormously. They grew from” Lakhpati” to”Crorpati“and from”Crorpati” to” Arabpati “. They have expanded their business, brought out new editions of their newspapers from different cities, adding new dailies and periodicals and launching side business ventures thus beefing up their assets and finances in geometrical progression. Add to this the phenomenal increase in their earning from advertisements (increase both in space and rates) and circulation. Keep in view the fact that they increased the per copy price of their newspapers from Rupees One to Ten in the case of Urdu dailies and up to thirteen in the case of English. Some of the newspaper owners are ready to launch T.V. channels and cable networks. And the millions of rupees the APNS’s members used to deposit in their bank accounts through the illegal sale of newsprint, they were receiving in excess of their requirements in the form of quotas granted by the successive governments.
It goes to the credit of PFUJ and its leadership that they never considered their struggle in isolation. They not only worked hard to unite with other employees within the newspaper industry but also strived to close their ranks with toiling masses of other industries and professions at large for the common cause of their welfare and fighting against the forces of exploitation. It was for this objective that the PFUJ was able to first organize the Central Ad-hoc Committee for the newspaper Employees Unions (CACNEU) in 1973 and later established the All Pakistan Newspaper Employees Confederation (APNEC) in 1976. In October 1977, at the initiative of the PFUJ the Karachi Workers Coordination Committee (KWCC) was formed comprising leading trade Union federations of Sindh. The KWCC was expanded into All Pakistan organization known as Pakistan Workers Coordination Committee or Pakistan Mazdoor Rabita Committee at a representative meeting held in Lahore in January 1978 following the gruesome police firing on striking workers of the Colony Textile Mills, Multan, resulting in the death of scores of workers. This was the period of General Zia-ul-Haq’s Martial Law and the official Inquiry Committee appointed to probe into this bloody incident never published its report.
The PFUJ has never favoured extra constitutional and authoritarian governance regardless of its form- military or Civilian. For it strongly believes that without a constitutional framework and democratic dispensation rooted in the consent and aspirations of the people protecting and promoting their fundamental interests, freedom of the press and expression cannot flourish. The PFUJ has seen and faced stringent martial law regimes as well as autocratic civilian governments and courageously fought for a free press and workers’ rights and its crusade offered great sacrifices.
It also believes that both the struggle for freedom of the press and struggle for workers economic and other rights are inseparable from each other as they are integral elements of their fundamental human rights. The main essence and objective of these human rights is to establish a civil society free from oppression, injustice and exploitation. These days it is a fashion to use the term” civil society” in a totally abstract manner. If the majority of the people of a society i.e. the workers, peasants and middle classes are oppressed and exploited that society can neither be civil nor democratic howsoever it may be labeled. The Pakistani society from its very inception has been under a system of oppression and exploitation. The system is multi-facet. It is both feudal and capitalistic as well as neo-colonialist operating through the international financial institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and indeed the so-called globalization. Unfortunately most of our ruling classes — military as well as civilian –, the big business, the big feudal, the upper echelons of the bureaucracy and even some of the NGOs funded by foreign donors are sold out to this system of exploitation. They are the defenders of status quo in the name of Islam, democracy, stability and human rights.
The attitude of the Musharraf government towards the print media has been so far permissive. They have been tolerating criticism much against their grain. However they have kept a tight control over the electronic media -Television and Radio – wherein the views and news in opposition to the government are not permitted, as was the case during the civilian regimes. However the stringent manner in which the military government has banned trade union and political activities and imposed its own concept of selective accountability and justice is reflective of its authoritarian and oppressive nature.
Before concluding, reference in passing may be made to the reported agreement between the Information Ministry and the Council of Pakistan Newspapers Editors (over 90 per cent proprietors i.e. publishers who have nothing to do with the editing of the newspapers) regarding formation of a Press Council. According to newspaper reports the Government and the CPNE have already agreed on the draft” law” of the Council which can be established anytime through an Ordinance. The draft has been kept a tightly closed secret and has not been publicised with a view to soliciting public opinion on its constitutional framework and the code of ethics it has to follow. Now this is the sixth or seventh time since 1963 (following the introduction of the infamous Press Ordinance) that a ” Press Council ” or a ” Press Court of Honour ” with a Code of ethics for the print media alone is being given birth to – the Government always being the midwife (though the babe always proved to be still-born). The PFUJ in principle has never been against the formation of an independent and non-governmental press council with an agreed code. But its position has been that in a country where the executive is armed with extraordinary coercive laws, which could be used to stifle the press, and where the authorities and the electronic media are not bound by any code of ethics, formation of a press council would amount to chaining the press doubly. And the PFUJ continues to stick to this position.
According to reports the press council being set up by the government-CPNE-APNS combined will neither be independent nor self -regulatory as it will be a statutory body fully funded by the government and largely manned by the proprietors. In democracies like UK, Germany and France the press councils are non-governmental, genuinely independent, and self-regulatory and financed by press bodies themselves. And their indeed are no coercive laws like MPO and where the electronic media is also governed by an agreed democratic code.
Intermedia:
Intermedia is a registered not-for-profit organization working for journalists' capacity building and strengthening freedom of information since 2005. In the last two years Intermedia has held theme-based training workshops for media persons in different parts of the country.
Our main objective is to promote free media through fair media laws and reforms, to make research, advocacy and monitoring and to strengthen media rights bodies. As we believe in freedom of expression, access to information and citizens making informed opinions and decisions, our core value is to promote an informed, democratic and tolerant society.
Intermedia aim at strengthening freedom of expression in Pakistan and provide information about Pakistani media and also that monitors violations of press freedom in the country.
The Center reaches out to other Pakistani institutions in the field, including media outlets, educational institutions, research centers, government agencies and regulators and legislators. The center focuses on specific areas of concerns, such as defamation, media law and policy, and the relationship between mass media and the courts. The center is also the point of contact for other rule on law projects that have no mass media component. One such project would be model courts that emphasize transparency of court procedure, which could benefit from public exposure.
Mission:
Practicing reporters and journalism students have greater access to information about case law and legal issues of public importance. Stipends support increased publication and dissemination of articles and programs on legal issues, media law, the court system, important cases, and the rule of law in Pakistan. Journalists and media managers routinely turn to the website for background on legal issues. Journalists, institutions and the public have greater access to information, opinions and discussions of legal issue. Case studies to improve understanding of threats to freedom of expression.
The Women Media Center (WMC):
The Women Media Center (WMC) is a non-profit organization and its core function is to carry out research, training and education of media women. The WMC is a unique body in its conception and functions. Diverse factors contributed to establish such body primarily due to feeble democratic structure in Pakistan and insignificant number of women in mainstream media. Another objective of the WMC is to promote new and creative ways of thinking among the Pakistani women so that their valuable suggestions may be included in the country’s polices.
The WMC is currently involved in organizing projects, which will promote women journalists to work in an enabling professional environment with major media organizations and work for strengthening democracy and other vital societal issues.
Currently situated in the largest metropolis of Pakistan i.e. Karachi, the WMC aspires not only to reach all areas of Pakistan but also to expand its operation in whole of South Asia.
Mission:
Aim to provide professional environment to women journalist.
Strive to raise awareness of democratic and civic issues from the perspective of Pakistani women journalist.
Endeavor to increase women's participation in the mainstream media through training, research and education.
Address the entry barriers confronted by women journalist and maintain liaison with media industry to facilitate against women journalist.
Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF):
Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF) is an independent media research, documentation and training centre working to promote and defend freedom of press.
Objectives:
· To help raise the standards of journalism particularly of the vernacular and regional press.
· To promote and defend freedom of expression in Pakistan and internationally.
· To encourage research on mass communication in Pakistan.
· To promote through the media, greater awareness of social and development issues.
Activities:
· Seminars and workshops on issues in mass communication.
· Training for journalists.
· Development of training materials for journalists.
· Professional research and documentation on media in Pakistan.
International status:
PPF is recognised internationally as a credible organization working to improve the standards of journalism and defending freedom of expression. The PPF is a member of the Commonwealth Press Union (CPU), International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX), and Commonwealth Journalists Association (CJA), Asia Media and Information Centre (AMIC), Commonwealth Association for Education in Journalism and Communications (CAEJC), Council of Asian-Pacific Press Institutes (CAPPI) and the Asian-Pacific Communication Network. In 2000, The Royal Society for the Arts, UK approves the PPF for issuing National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) in journalism.
The PPF collaborates with leading national and international organizations in organizing training activities including the Commonwealth Press Union (CPU), UNESCO, Friedrich Ebert Sifting (FES), The Thompson Foundation, The British Council, The Knight International Foundation, and International Centre for Foreign Journalists and The Freedom Forum.
December 20, 2009
War Against Terror
war on Terrorism:
Led by Osama Bin Laden, a radical Islamist trained by the US during the 1980s to conduct guerilla attacks against the Soviet Army in Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda formed a large base of operations in Afghanistan, which had been ruled by the Islamist extremist regime of the Taliban since 1996.
Following the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, U.S. President Bill Clinton launched Operation Infinite Reach, a bombing campaign in Sudan and Afghanistan against targets the U.S. asserted were associated with al-Qaeda Although others have questioned the Sudan plant's use as a chemical warfare plant The strikes failed to kill al-Qaeda'a leaders or their Taliban supporters (targets included a civilian pharmaceutical plant in Sudan that produced much of the region's malaria drugs and around 50% of Sudan's pharmaceutical needs ).
Next came the 2000 millennium attack plots which included an attempted bombing of Los Angeles International Airport. In October 2000 the USS Cole bombing occurred,[21] followed in 2001 by the September 11 attacks. By 2003, 12 major conventions and protocols were designed to combat terrorism. These were as well, adopted and ratified by a number of states to become international law. These conventions require states to co-operate on principal issues regarding unlawful seizure of aircraft for example, the physical protection of nuclear materials and freezing assets of militant networks.
In 2005 the Security Council also adopted resolution 1624 concerning incitement to commit acts of terrorism and the obligations of countries to comply with international human rights laws. Although both resolutions require mandatory annual reports on counterterrorism activities by adopting nations, the United States and Israel have both declined to submit reports.
Historical usage of phrase
Main article: War on Terrorism (historical)
The phrase "War on Terrorism" was first widely used by the Western press to refer to the attempts by European governments, and eventually the US government, to stop attacks by anarchists against leaders and officials. (See, for example, The New York Times, April 2, 1881.) For example, on 24 January 1878, Russian Marxist Vera Zasulich shot and wounded a Russian police commander who was known to torture suspects. She threw down her weapon without killing him, announcing; "I am a terrorist, not a killer." The phrase "war on terrorism" gained currency when it was used to describe the efforts by the British colonial government to end a spate of attacks by Zionist Jews in the British Mandate of Palestine in the late 1940s. The British proclaimed a "War on Terrorism" against Zionist groups such as Irgun and Lehi, and anyone perceived to be cooperating with them.
The Zionist attacks, Arab attacks and revolts, and the subsequent British crackdown hastened the British evacuation from Palestine. The phrase was also used frequently by US President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, to describe his campaigns against Libya and Nicaragua.
On September 20, 2001, during a televised address to a joint session of congress, President George W. Bush launched the war on terror when he said, "Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated." Bush did not say when he expected this would be achieved. (Previous to this usage, after stepping off the presidential helicopter on Sunday, September 16, 2001, Bush stated in an unscripted and controversial comment: "This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while." Bush later apologized for this remark due to the negative connotations the word crusade has to people of Muslim faith. The word crusade was not used again).
US President Barack Obama has rarely used the term, but in his inaugural address on January 20, 2009, he stated "Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred."It is likely that the phrase will fall into disuse, as one referring to concepts and strategies of his predecessor. In March 2009 the Defense Department officially changed the name of operations from "Global War on Terror" to "Overseas Contingency Operation" (OCO).
British objections to the phrase "war on terrorism"
The Director of Public Prosecutions and head of the Crown Prosecution Service in the United Kingdom, Ken McDonald—Britain's most senior criminal prosecutor—has stated that those responsible for acts of terror such as the 7 July 2005 London bombings are not "soldiers" in a war, but "inadequates" who should be dealt with by the criminal justice system. He added that a "culture of legislative restraint" was needed in passing anti-terrorism laws, and that a "primary purpose" of the violent attacks was to tempt countries such as Britain to "abandon our values." He stated that in the eyes of the British criminal justice system, the response to terrorism had to be "proportionate, and grounded in due process and the rule of law":
"
London is not a battlefield. Those innocents who were murdered...were not victims of war. And the men who killed them were not, as in their vanity they claimed on their ludicrous videos, 'soldiers'. They were deluded, narcissistic inadequates. They were criminals. They were fantasists. We need to be very clear about this. On the streets of London there is no such thing as a war on terror. The fight against terrorism on the streets of Britain is not a war. It is the prevention of crime, the enforcement of our laws, and the winning of justice for those damaged by their infringement.
"
In January 2009, the British Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, wrote "ultimately, the notion is misleading and mistaken" and later said "Historians will judge whether [the notion] has done more harm than good".
US objectives
The George W. Bush administration defined the following objectives in the War on Terrorism:
1. Defeat terrorists such as Osama Bin Laden, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and destroy their organizations
2. Identify, locate and destroy terrorists along with their organizations
3. Deny sponsorship, support and sanctuary to terrorists
1. End the state sponsorship of terrorism
2. Establish and maintain an international standard of accountability with regard to combating terrorism
3. Strengthen and sustain the international effort to fight terrorism
4. Work with willing and able states
5. Enable weak states
6. Persuade reluctant states
7. Compel unwilling states
8. Interdict and disrupt material support for terrorists
9. Eliminate terrorist sanctuaries and havens
4. Diminish the underlying conditions that terrorists seek to exploit
1. Partner with the international community to strengthen weak states and prevent (re)emergence of terrorism
2. Win the war of ideals
5. Defend US citizens and interests at home and abroad
1. Implement the National Strategy for Homeland Security
2. Attain domain awareness
3. Enhance measures to ensure the integrity, reliability, and availability of critical physical and information-based infrastructures at home and abroad
4. Integrate measures to protect US citizens abroad
5. Ensure an integrated incident management capability.
Led by Osama Bin Laden, a radical Islamist trained by the US during the 1980s to conduct guerilla attacks against the Soviet Army in Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda formed a large base of operations in Afghanistan, which had been ruled by the Islamist extremist regime of the Taliban since 1996.
Following the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, U.S. President Bill Clinton launched Operation Infinite Reach, a bombing campaign in Sudan and Afghanistan against targets the U.S. asserted were associated with al-Qaeda Although others have questioned the Sudan plant's use as a chemical warfare plant The strikes failed to kill al-Qaeda'a leaders or their Taliban supporters (targets included a civilian pharmaceutical plant in Sudan that produced much of the region's malaria drugs and around 50% of Sudan's pharmaceutical needs ).
Next came the 2000 millennium attack plots which included an attempted bombing of Los Angeles International Airport. In October 2000 the USS Cole bombing occurred,[21] followed in 2001 by the September 11 attacks. By 2003, 12 major conventions and protocols were designed to combat terrorism. These were as well, adopted and ratified by a number of states to become international law. These conventions require states to co-operate on principal issues regarding unlawful seizure of aircraft for example, the physical protection of nuclear materials and freezing assets of militant networks.
In 2005 the Security Council also adopted resolution 1624 concerning incitement to commit acts of terrorism and the obligations of countries to comply with international human rights laws. Although both resolutions require mandatory annual reports on counterterrorism activities by adopting nations, the United States and Israel have both declined to submit reports.
Historical usage of phrase
Main article: War on Terrorism (historical)
The phrase "War on Terrorism" was first widely used by the Western press to refer to the attempts by European governments, and eventually the US government, to stop attacks by anarchists against leaders and officials. (See, for example, The New York Times, April 2, 1881.) For example, on 24 January 1878, Russian Marxist Vera Zasulich shot and wounded a Russian police commander who was known to torture suspects. She threw down her weapon without killing him, announcing; "I am a terrorist, not a killer." The phrase "war on terrorism" gained currency when it was used to describe the efforts by the British colonial government to end a spate of attacks by Zionist Jews in the British Mandate of Palestine in the late 1940s. The British proclaimed a "War on Terrorism" against Zionist groups such as Irgun and Lehi, and anyone perceived to be cooperating with them.
The Zionist attacks, Arab attacks and revolts, and the subsequent British crackdown hastened the British evacuation from Palestine. The phrase was also used frequently by US President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, to describe his campaigns against Libya and Nicaragua.
On September 20, 2001, during a televised address to a joint session of congress, President George W. Bush launched the war on terror when he said, "Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated." Bush did not say when he expected this would be achieved. (Previous to this usage, after stepping off the presidential helicopter on Sunday, September 16, 2001, Bush stated in an unscripted and controversial comment: "This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while." Bush later apologized for this remark due to the negative connotations the word crusade has to people of Muslim faith. The word crusade was not used again).
US President Barack Obama has rarely used the term, but in his inaugural address on January 20, 2009, he stated "Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred."It is likely that the phrase will fall into disuse, as one referring to concepts and strategies of his predecessor. In March 2009 the Defense Department officially changed the name of operations from "Global War on Terror" to "Overseas Contingency Operation" (OCO).
British objections to the phrase "war on terrorism"
The Director of Public Prosecutions and head of the Crown Prosecution Service in the United Kingdom, Ken McDonald—Britain's most senior criminal prosecutor—has stated that those responsible for acts of terror such as the 7 July 2005 London bombings are not "soldiers" in a war, but "inadequates" who should be dealt with by the criminal justice system. He added that a "culture of legislative restraint" was needed in passing anti-terrorism laws, and that a "primary purpose" of the violent attacks was to tempt countries such as Britain to "abandon our values." He stated that in the eyes of the British criminal justice system, the response to terrorism had to be "proportionate, and grounded in due process and the rule of law":
"
London is not a battlefield. Those innocents who were murdered...were not victims of war. And the men who killed them were not, as in their vanity they claimed on their ludicrous videos, 'soldiers'. They were deluded, narcissistic inadequates. They were criminals. They were fantasists. We need to be very clear about this. On the streets of London there is no such thing as a war on terror. The fight against terrorism on the streets of Britain is not a war. It is the prevention of crime, the enforcement of our laws, and the winning of justice for those damaged by their infringement.
"
In January 2009, the British Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, wrote "ultimately, the notion is misleading and mistaken" and later said "Historians will judge whether [the notion] has done more harm than good".
US objectives
The George W. Bush administration defined the following objectives in the War on Terrorism:
1. Defeat terrorists such as Osama Bin Laden, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and destroy their organizations
2. Identify, locate and destroy terrorists along with their organizations
3. Deny sponsorship, support and sanctuary to terrorists
1. End the state sponsorship of terrorism
2. Establish and maintain an international standard of accountability with regard to combating terrorism
3. Strengthen and sustain the international effort to fight terrorism
4. Work with willing and able states
5. Enable weak states
6. Persuade reluctant states
7. Compel unwilling states
8. Interdict and disrupt material support for terrorists
9. Eliminate terrorist sanctuaries and havens
4. Diminish the underlying conditions that terrorists seek to exploit
1. Partner with the international community to strengthen weak states and prevent (re)emergence of terrorism
2. Win the war of ideals
5. Defend US citizens and interests at home and abroad
1. Implement the National Strategy for Homeland Security
2. Attain domain awareness
3. Enhance measures to ensure the integrity, reliability, and availability of critical physical and information-based infrastructures at home and abroad
4. Integrate measures to protect US citizens abroad
5. Ensure an integrated incident management capability.
December 1, 2009
MILLION OF ASTHMA SUFFERERS
Millions of asthma sufferers 'misuse their medication'
MILLIONS of asthmatics could be taking their medication incorrectly, according to a leading pharmacist.Many are unsure about when or how to use inhalers, which reduces their effectiveness and can be a health risk. The level of public confusion came to light as a result of the new Boots Asthma Inhaler Check, part of the High Street chemist’s NHS-funded Medicines Check-Up scheme launched last summer. The free nationwide service is designed to help patients use long-term prescription drugs properly. During a 15-minute in-store check, a pharmacist helps with inhaler technique and reviews whether the right drug has been prescribed to suit individual needs. Patients are also offered help in identifying triggers that make their asthma worse. More than five million individuals in the UK receive treatment for asthma. Boots pharmacist Angela Chalmers says: ‘When a patient is diagnosed, there is a lot of information to take in, which can be misunderstood or forgotten. We have found that nine out of ten patients are not using their inhaler properly.’ – MailAsthma causes the airways in the lungs to become inflamed and swollen, often as a reaction to certain irritants. Common triggers include dust mites, animal fur, pollen, tobacco smoke and cold air. Symptoms include wheezing, coughing and tightness in the chest. Inhalers used to treat asthma fall broadly into two categories - reliever medicines that are used during an attack and regular preventative therapy to stop attacks from happening. A second regular inhaler may be given to those with severe asthma. ‘We found patients either breathe in too fast or not strongly enough,’ explains Chalmers. ‘If individuals can’t alter their technique, we can speak to their GP about finding a different medicine.’ A study at Belfast City Hospital published last month revealed 35 per cent of asthmatics used half or less of their prescribed medication, and 21 per cent used more than prescribed.
MILLIONS of asthmatics could be taking their medication incorrectly, according to a leading pharmacist.Many are unsure about when or how to use inhalers, which reduces their effectiveness and can be a health risk. The level of public confusion came to light as a result of the new Boots Asthma Inhaler Check, part of the High Street chemist’s NHS-funded Medicines Check-Up scheme launched last summer. The free nationwide service is designed to help patients use long-term prescription drugs properly. During a 15-minute in-store check, a pharmacist helps with inhaler technique and reviews whether the right drug has been prescribed to suit individual needs. Patients are also offered help in identifying triggers that make their asthma worse. More than five million individuals in the UK receive treatment for asthma. Boots pharmacist Angela Chalmers says: ‘When a patient is diagnosed, there is a lot of information to take in, which can be misunderstood or forgotten. We have found that nine out of ten patients are not using their inhaler properly.’ – MailAsthma causes the airways in the lungs to become inflamed and swollen, often as a reaction to certain irritants. Common triggers include dust mites, animal fur, pollen, tobacco smoke and cold air. Symptoms include wheezing, coughing and tightness in the chest. Inhalers used to treat asthma fall broadly into two categories - reliever medicines that are used during an attack and regular preventative therapy to stop attacks from happening. A second regular inhaler may be given to those with severe asthma. ‘We found patients either breathe in too fast or not strongly enough,’ explains Chalmers. ‘If individuals can’t alter their technique, we can speak to their GP about finding a different medicine.’ A study at Belfast City Hospital published last month revealed 35 per cent of asthmatics used half or less of their prescribed medication, and 21 per cent used more than prescribed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)